Per a request from the Provost, a team of faculty and staff created guidelines to help faculty think about how generative AI may impact their teaching.
Generative AI Guidelines Work Group: Jessica Bell, Director of the Library; Kevin Berner, Asst Professor in Occupational Therapy; Steve Ciessielski, Asst Dean for Student Success in SON; Shuhan He, Director of Healthcare Data Analytics Program; Mike Monteiro, Director of Enterprise Software Applications and Systems; Greg Moore, Instructional Technology Manager; Andy Phillips, Assoc Professor in Nursing; Eleonor Pusey-Reid, Assoc Professor in Nursing.
Statement prohibiting the use of generative AI tools
Individual and team assignments are expected to adhere to the IHP’s academic integrity policy. Students are expected to compose, summarize, compare, and synthesize without the use of unauthorized aids including artificial intelligence (AI) tools or AI language models. Reference managers (eg. Mendeley, Zotero) and spelling / grammar checkers are the exception and can be used to improve the readability and language of student writing. Students suspected of inappropriately using unauthorized aids such as AI language models / content creators will be referred to [your program’s policy/committee on academic policies].
Statement allowing generative AI tools with citations
Individual and team assignments are expected to adhere to the IHP’s academic integrity policy. Students may choose to utilize generative AI such as Chat GPT for assignments if it is consistent with assignment expectations and sources of content are cited appropriately. Methods of citation should utilize current best practices for attribution and citations such as this guidance from American Psychological Association. Students suspected of inappropriately using unauthorized aids such as AI language models / content creators will be referred to [your program’s policy/committee on academic policies].
More Examples
